You are here: Home » Guides » A Faculty Guide to Cyber-Plagiarism » Reporting

Reporting Plagiarism

Reporting a plagiarizer and filing charges against a student can be a painful, time-consuming experience for faculty but the worst course of action is to turn a blind eye to students who plagiarize. Ignoring plagiarism undermines the value of education, it undermines the university, and it undermines the academic community -- including the faculty member's career. So what should faculty do when they suspect a student of plagiarizing?

Reporting plagiarism

The University of Alberta Code of Student Behaviour provides guidelines for faculty to follow when they suspect plagiarism has occurred. It is important to remember that sanctions can only be imposed by the Dean of the department. Dealing with a plagiarizer on one's own and ignoring the judicial process undermines the University's ability to administer appropriate punishment.

Some additional resources faculty can consult when they suspect plagiarism and are unsure of what the next step should be are the:

  • Plagiarism and Cheating: Cheat Sheet

  • Office of the Dean of Students

  • Discipline Office -- 289 CAB -- Phone: 492-0777 -- Email: deputydiscipline.officer@ualberta.ca

    It is important to let students know what their rights are when they have been charged with plagiarism. The Student Omsbud Service is an excellent resource for students, as is the University Secretariat: Student Appeals and Discipline.

    Why faculty may be reluctant to report a plagiarizer

    A study conducted on nine campuses at Rutgers University at Newark found that of 800 professors at 16 institutions, 54% had "seldom" reported cheating, 40% had "never" reported cheating, and only 6% had "often" reported cheating (McCabe found in Schneider, Alison).

    Why are the numbers of reported cases of cheating so low?

    Some of the reasons why faculty members are often reluctant to file a formal charge against a student include:

    • Some perceive the university judicial process as tedious, time-consuming, and un-supportive of faculty members.

    • Often the punishments do not fit the crime. For example the punishment for plagiarism at some universities may be the same whether the student stole another person's entire paper, handed it in as original work, and committed fraud, or the student misquoted a source, or didn't give proper attribution for either words or ideas. Clearly these are different degrees of academic dishonesty.

    • Most faculty members do not want to damage the student's reputation or career and would rather confront the student themselves.

    • It can be difficult to prove that plagiarism has occured.

    • Some faculty members are concerned that lodging formal charges against a student can reflect negatively on their teaching skills.

    • Tracking down a plagiarized paper or the sources used can require hours of research.

    • University departments may not have consistent policies established for dealing with plagiarism.

    • Some faculty members believe that they have very little impact on the judicial process when cases are turned over to administration.

    • It can be a traumatic, emotionally draining experience for a professor to charge a student with cheating.

    Recommended Resources >>